Note: When clicking on a Digital Object Identifier (DOI) number, you will be taken to an external site maintained by the publisher.
Some full text articles may not yet be available without a charge during the embargo (administrative interval).
What is a DOI Number?
Some links on this page may take you to non-federal websites. Their policies may differ from this site.
-
Free, publicly-accessible full text available February 1, 2026
-
Abstract Cooling energy demand is sensitive to urban form and socioeconomic characteristics of cities. Climate change will impact how these characteristics influence cooling demand. We use random forest machine learning methods to analyze the sensitivity of cooling demand in Chicago, IL, to weather, vegetation, building type, socioeconomic, and control variables by dividing census tracts of the city into four groups: below-Q1 income–hot days; above-Q1 income–hot days; below-Q1 income–regular days; and above-Q1 income–regular days. Below-Q1 census tracts experienced an increase in cooling demand on hot days while above-Q1 census tracts did not see an increase in demand. Weather (i.e. heat index and wind speed) and control variables (i.e. month of year, holidays and weekends) unsurprisingly had the most influence on cooling demand. Among the variables of interest, vegetation was associated with reduced cooling demand for below-Q1 income on hot days and increased cooling demand for below-Q1 income on regular days. In above-Q1 income census tracts building type was the most closely associated non-weather or control variable with cooling demand. The sensitivity of cooling demand for below-Q1 income census tracts to vegetation on hot days suggests vegetation could become more important for keeping cities cool for low-income populations as global temperatures increase. This result further highlights the importance of considering environmental justice in urban design.more » « less
-
Abstract Building community resilience in the face of climate disasters is critical to achieving a sustainable future. Operational approaches to resilience favor systems’ agile return to the status quo following a disruption. Here, we show that an overemphasis on recovery without accounting for transformation entrenches ‘resilience traps’–risk factors within a community that are predictive of recovery, but inhibit transformation. By quantifying resilience including both recovery and transformation, we identify risk factors which catalyze or inhibit transformation in a case study of community resilience in Florida during Hurricane Michael in 2018. We find that risk factors such as housing tenure, income inequality, and internet access have the capability to trigger transformation. Additionally, we find that 55% of key predictors of recovery are potential resilience traps, including factors related to poverty, ethnicity and mobility. Finally, we discuss maladaptation which could occur as a result of disaster policies which emphasize resilience traps.more » « less
An official website of the United States government

Full Text Available